Local Plan Consultation Delayed Again

We were expecting the next Local Plan consultation to start next month but looking at the agenda for Thursday’s cabinet meeting it looks like it has been postponed until October. We are trying to find out why.
 
According to the documents to be approved by cabinet, Princes Parade is a preferred site with a target of 150 houses whereas the Golf Course has been deemed unsuitable for development. Read more here – item 6:
 
Once we have seen the minutes of the cabinet meeting we will decide how to respond to this.

Dates for your Diary

Our drop in session so that you can catch up on the latest news and find out what the next steps are will be on Sat 25 June 2-5pm in Seabrook Church Hall. And a picnic has been arrange for Jul 9 4pm meet at the children’s play area.

Herald Poll

82% of those taking part in the poll voted for leave it alone.” This is very similar to the proportion of people who opted for no development in the consultation for in the  Places & Policies consultation (part of Shepway’s Local Plan process) but will David Monk acknowledge that?

 

Apostrophe

The Martello column in today’s Herald queries why we use an apostrophe in Prince’s Parade. The reason we do so is that the promenade was opened by the Prince of Wales on 15th October 1881.

Resource Scrutiny Committee Wed & April 7pm

There is an item called Princes Parade update on the agenda for the Resource Scrutiny Committee meeting at Shepway next Wed 6th April at 7pm. It’s not clear whether this is just an update from when we asked the committee to take another look at Nickoll’s Quarry or whether this is the next step in Shepway’s attempt to develop the site but either way please do your best to join us in the public gallery.

Are Shepway Stupid?

On 28 May 2014 David Monk said “that when the indicative costs were £11m I wasn’t pleased and if the costs had stayed at that we wouldn’t be where we are today. We wouldn’t be going forward…….because we aren’t stupid.” (See 1.10.47 on this video).

However, Shepway are once again planning on putting the leisure centre on PP. Their own report C/15/38 (cabinet meeting 4 Nov 2015) states that the cost of the recreation centre will be £8.65m plus £2.15m for remediation of contaminated land plus significant costs to mitigate the harm to the Royal Military Canal. So that’s going to more than £11m not counting other possible costs arising from risks not yet identified.